Two audits, two evidence requests, the same screenshot twiceSubmit it once instead

Ingests the whole evidence pile, merges the controls that need the same artifact across frameworks, and reviews each one against what the files actually say, including when two of them contradict each other.

Try it

Interactive demo with a completed PCI + SOC 2 review, no signup, no cloud account

How It Works

Ingest, target, merge, review.

01

Ingest

Drop in 200 to 300 files. Text is extracted from every format, OCR for screenshots, multi-round transcription for long PDFs, AI parsing for spreadsheets, and anything unreadable is flagged before the review runs.

02

Target

Pick the specific controls in question rather than running an entire framework. PCI DSS and SOC 2 matrices are bundled; ISO, HIPAA, NIST or your own matrix upload as CSV, JSON or Excel.

03

Merge

Set the audit scope per standard. Controls covering the same scope that need the same evidence merge into one request, so each artifact is submitted once and satisfies both frameworks.

04

Review

Each control gets a verdict led by a single plain-language concern, with severity-ranked observations, a required-versus-actual gap statement and numbered remediation.

What You Can Do

Everything the reviewer does.

Built for the whole pile

Designed around real engagements of 200 to 300 artifacts. Six file categories detected automatically, extraction parallelised, and progress reported file by file rather than as a single spinner.

See it in the demo

Reads screenshots and long documents

OCR for images, and multi-round transcription for PDFs and Word documents that continues until the document actually ends, so page 40 is read, not just page 2.

See it in the demo

It says what it could not read

BMP, TIFF, SVG and HEIC are not text-extractable. Those files are flagged up front rather than silently contributing nothing to the review.

See it in the demo

Six frameworks, two bundled

PCI DSS v4.0.1 with all 133 requirements and SOC 2 Type II with 55 controls ship built in. ISO 27001, HIPAA, NIST 800-53 or a custom matrix upload as CSV, JSON or Excel with AI-assisted column mapping.

See it in the demo

Submit shared evidence once

The feature that saves the week. Controls from different frameworks covering the same scope and needing the same artifact merge into a single evidence request, with the frameworks it satisfies listed against it.

See it in the demo

Merging is strictly scope-bound

Two standards only merge where their audit scope is identical. Different scope means different evidence, and the tool keeps them separate rather than producing a convenient false pass.

See it in the demo

Mapping you can correct

Evidence is matched to requests automatically in batches, with the reason recorded against each file. Every mapping is editable, add what was missed, remove what was wrong.

See it in the demo

The concern first

Each failing control leads with one sentence naming the actual problem. Supporting detail sits behind it and low-signal observations collapse by default, so the finding is not buried in its own evidence.

See it in the demo

It reads evidence against itself

When a policy claims one thing and a configuration screenshot shows another, the review names the contradiction rather than accepting the policy at face value.

See it in the demo

It will not hedge

Marking everything Partially Compliant is the easy way to look rigorous. The review is instructed that adequate evidence must return Compliant, so a clean verdict means something.

See it in the demo

Required versus actual, per control

What the requirement demands, set against what the evidence demonstrates, with the delta stated explicitly instead of left for the reader to infer.

See it in the demo

Evidence that outlives the session

Uploaded artifacts are promoted to a durable per-customer folder alongside the results and a shareable status snapshot, so the pack is still there when the auditor asks in six weeks.

See it in the demo

Business Outcomes

What it changes.

Once

Overlapping controls across frameworks are answered by one artifact, so the evidence chase happens a single time rather than per audit.

Read

Evidence is assessed against the requirement and against itself, catching the contradictions that a filing exercise would pass straight over.

Early

You find out that the restore log is empty and the plan was never tested now, rather than in the fieldwork meeting where it becomes a finding.

Point it at the evidence you already have.

Upload the pack and the first review returns verdicts across both frameworks in minutes.