Your scanner found 342 vulnerabilitiesNine of them can actually be exploited on something that matters

Ranks container vulnerabilities by whether they are exploitable on an asset that counts, not by raw CVSS, so the medium being attacked on your public payment service outranks the isolated critical nobody can reach.

Try it

Interactive demo with a prioritised fleet, no signup, no cloud account

How It Works

Collect, enrich, score, plan.

01

Collect

Every ECR image scan and Amazon Inspector finding across all repositories, with pagination handled so nothing is truncated.

02

Enrich

Each vulnerability is enriched with its EPSS exploitation probability, known-exploit status, and the asset context, environment, criticality and data classification, pulled from resource tags.

03

Score

A composite score weights CVSS at 30 percent, exploitability at 25, and asset criticality and exposure at 35, producing a P0 to P3 class with a fix-by deadline.

04

Plan

Findings are traced to their root packages, so the remediation plan proposes base-image upgrades that close several at once, with the projected reduction stated.

What You Can Do

Everything the prioritizer does.

Priority is exploitability, not CVSS

A composite of CVSS, EPSS, known-exploit presence, asset criticality and exposure. An actively exploited medium on a public asset outranks an isolated critical, which is the entire point, and it is what raw CVSS gets wrong.

See it in the demo

The weighting is published

The five factors and their weights are printed on the dashboard. Every priority class is reproducible rather than emerging from a model nobody can inspect.

See it in the demo

It shows its reasoning per finding

Open any vulnerability and it explains why it scored where it did, the CVSS, the EPSS, whether an exploit exists, and the exposure and criticality of the asset it sits on.

See it in the demo

ECR and Inspector, unified

Image scan findings and Amazon Inspector findings across every repository in one ranked view, deduplicated and scored on the same scale.

See it in the demo

Root-package analysis

Many findings trace to a handful of shared packages. Fixing openssl once is recognised as closing three findings across three images, so effort goes where it has the most leverage.

See it in the demo

Remediation with projected impact

Concrete base-image upgrade paths with the effort, the vulnerabilities fixed, and a before-and-after count, so the plan is a set of decisions, not a list of CVEs.

See it in the demo

Fix-by deadlines

P0 within 24 hours, P1 within 7 days, P2 within 30, P3 within 90. The priority class carries a service level, so the queue has a clock rather than just an order.

See it in the demo

Asset context from tags

Application, environment, team, criticality and data classification are pulled from resource tags, so findings route to the owner and PCI-scoped assets are weighted accordingly.

See it in the demo

Resilient to an empty account

No repositories, no problem, an empty state says so rather than rendering a broken dashboard, and Inspector being disabled falls back to ECR-only cleanly.

See it in the demo

Business Outcomes

What it changes.

Focused

The team spends its week on the nine findings that are exploitable on assets that matter, not the top of a CVSS sort.

Leveraged

Root-package analysis turns dozens of findings into a handful of base-image upgrades, so each fix closes several.

Defensible

A published weighting and a per-finding rationale mean the prioritisation survives a question from an auditor or an engineer who disagrees.

Fix what is exploitable, not what scores highest.

Connect a read-only role and the first run ranks your whole container fleet in minutes.