The Attack Surface Is Not The Model
- Prompt injection arrives via documents and retrieval
- Tools invoked with unanticipated arguments
- Excessive agency turns assistants into incidents
- Auth bypass turns low-privilege into high-privilege
Discover, validate, chain and enforce across browser, desktop, IDE, CLI, MCP servers, cloud identities and enterprise data. One risk model.
Why It's Hard
Your SAST, DLP, CSPM and AI gateway each see a fragment. Nobody sees the whole path from prompt to production.

Adversarial testing is high value when it produces controls, not when it produces PDFs. Agent workflows keep discovery, validation and chaining continuous so assurance is a program, not an engagement.
Eight Assurance Domains
Map agent frameworks, models, SDKs, MCP servers, prompt and tool schemas, dependencies, secrets, SBOMs and provenance.
Explore the domainInventory browser, desktop, IDE and CLI AI usage by user, team, tenant, model, business purpose, data touched and outbound destination.
Explore the domainReview AWS and Azure AI Foundry identities, IAM, secrets, network paths, model endpoints, logs, storage, deployment permissions, sandboxes.
Explore the domainTest direct and indirect prompt injection, sensitive disclosure, jailbreaks, tool misuse, excessive agency, authorization bypass, destructive operations and control bypass.
Connect Git to CI/CD, registries, cloud identities, agent runtimes, MCP tools, SaaS and data. Rank toxic combinations by exploitability, reachability, privilege and blast radius.
Secure connectors, vector stores, embeddings, ACL mapping, tenant boundaries, retrieval pipelines, data classification, poisoning resistance and lineage.
Build the AI inventory, risk register, policies, approvals, control mappings, ownership, exceptions and evidence aligned to ISO 42001, NIST AI RMF and OWASP GenAI guidance.
Explore the domainMonitor browser, desktop, coding-agent, MCP and cloud actions. Before impact, hold the action and evaluate, then prove the outcome.
Explore the domain01
The agent's real surface is mapped first, its prompts, tools, retrieval sources, identities and the systems it can act on, so tests target what it can actually reach.
02
Direct prompts, poisoned documents, tainted retrieval results and hostile tool responses are used to attempt injection, disclosure and jailbreaks against that surface.
03
A successful probe is pushed further, from a disclosure to a tool call, from a tool call to a privilege, from a privilege to a destructive action, to find where autonomy stops being safe.
04
Every finding ships with the payload, transcript and reproduction steps, alongside the control that should have caught it, so the fix is specific, not a request for better guardrails.
Red-Team Coverage
Adversarial testing against your own agents, mapped to OWASP LLM Top 10 and Agentic guidance so results line up with the framework your auditors already recognise.
Payloads arriving in documents, web pages, tickets and retrieval results, the path that survives input filtering because nobody typed it.
Tools invoked with arguments the designer never anticipated, and the actions taken beyond the request that turn a helpful assistant into an incident.
Whether the agent's identity is more privileged than the user driving it, so a low-privilege request runs with high-privilege credentials.
The guardrails themselves are targeted, and tainted context is used to influence later, apparently unrelated conversations past the session.
Assurance is not a checklist. Red-teaming your own agents against direct and indirect injection, tool misuse, excessive agency and destructive operations produces reproducible findings mapped to the controls that should have stopped them.
What The Assessment Produces
Mapped
AI asset, dependency and attack-path graph.
Ranked
Toxic combinations scored by reachability.
Proven
A 30/60/90 roadmap with named owners.
A 60-minute design workshop maps what AI is present, what it can reach, and whether the harmful action can be stopped before data leaves.